Q&A with F. F. Mormanni

You’ve written across several genres—sci-fi, thriller, drama, fantasy, and horror. What draws you to explore such a wide range of stories?

As a kid, I was a voracious reader, and loved fantasy and sci-fi novels—anything with immersive world-building. So naturally, when I started writing my own stories, I leaned toward high fantasy. As time went on, I was exposed to a wider range of stories, mostly through regularly watching all kinds of films, and realized that I was interested in pretty much any genre if the themes were strong and the characters were compelling. 

I enjoy the challenge of writing stories in different genres. I think I am better at writing sci-fi and thriller, simply due to having practiced them more, but I don’t want to limit myself. 

Double Crossed and Mind the Gap both have unique titles—can you tell us the story behind them? 

Double Crossed is a medical techno-thriller novel about CRISPR and memory transfer technology being used for nefarious purposes—specifically, an attempt to infiltrate the government by surreptitiously planting a human clone in the White House, and how this impacts both geopolitics and the president’s relationship with his childhood best friend. For most of the writing process, I used a stand-in title, as nothing really clicked for me until after I had finished the first draft. 

Several characters in the novel are cloned using this technology without their knowledge or consent. The “double” in the title refers to both the literal existence of these clones and the duplicity required to keep them hidden. It’s a play on the espionage term “double cross” because, the doubles/clones, by impersonating their originals, betray the very values those originals stood for and the country for which they work.

I came up with the title for Mind the Gap early on in the writing process, though I didn’t fully develop its layered meaning until I had finished editing and started working on the script adaptation. The story follows rebellious young adults in the daredevil photography community—people who run through working subway tunnels, and climb bridges and skyscrapers. In the physical sense, the title refers to the gap between a safe subway platform and the dangerous subway tunnels. Additionally, “mind the gap” is a recurring statement over the loudspeakers on the London Underground (though my novel takes place in New York City). 

The title also represents the psychological gap between abstraction and reality. Rocco, the protagonist, and most of his friends stand on the brink of dangerous decisions, such as succumbing to the allure of drugs, trespassing, hanging out with the wrong crowd, or putting themselves in life-threatening situations. However, one of the themes I explore in the novel is that, although it might be tempting to participate in these risky behaviors, we have the ability to choose otherwise. 

How does your background in screenwriting influence the way you write novels, and vice versa?

When I come up with a story I think would work for both mediums, I usually write the novel first and then adapt it into a script. I find it easier to fully develop the world, characters, and plot in prose before figuring out how to extract the essentials into a much leaner format. 

This year is actually the first time I’m doing this process in reverse. With Whispered, my espionage thriller, the plot came to me quickly, and because screenplays are shorter, I decided to write the script first. Now I’m working on the novel version, and although having the skeleton already fully built is helpful, fleshing it out with the depth a novel requires is a completely different ballgame. 

My screenwriting background shapes the way I write novels, as I tend to visualize scenes cinematically. At the same time, writing novels is a good reminder of the importance of a strong literary tone, even for scripts, which tend to have limited word counts. 

Which of your literary influences—Asimov, Herbert, Tolkien, Rand—has shaped your voice the most, and how?

Ayn Rand has influenced my writing and my life in general more than any other author. Her writing style is incredibly clear, but also has a distinct artistic flair and sense of life. I re-read her fiction every few years and always discover something new. By regularly reading her works, I’ve learned how to develop conflict between characters and how to explore a wide range of themes within complex stories.

You’ve adapted some of your novels into screenplays. What’s the biggest challenge in translating your work for film?

The biggest challenge is learning how to extract the essentials from a novel to fit the constraints of a screenplay, which is typically around 120 pages, or two hours of screen time. As much as I would love to adapt every scene, the process requires cutting and reshaping certain things so they are more natural for actors to portray and more efficient for the screen. Descriptions need to be tight, but vivid—just enough for directors, producers, and other collaborators to understand the original vision.

How has performing at prestigious venues like Carnegie Hall and Lincoln Center shaped your approach to storytelling in other mediums?

Drawing from the old saying, “practice, practice, practice” to get to Carnegie Hall, it really did take years of consistent work before I could perform regularly at venues like that. It shaped my approach to storytelling in the sense that I understand how long it takes to get good at anything. I’ve carried that mindset into every other medium in which I work. 

Being in the classical music world has also exposed me to a wide range of experiences, including high-pressure situations. I’ve included some of these moments in scenes or storylines in my writing. 

You wear many hats—novelist, musician, producer, actress, and model. How do you stay creatively grounded across so many disciplines?

Practicing one discipline always helps me improve in others. For example, playing piano improves my dexterity, which carries over to flute and harp, and vice versa. Acting deepens my understanding of character development and dialogue, which makes me a stronger writer. 

I keep a database of ideas across all mediums. Some stories are better suited for film, others for a novel or piece of music. Being involved in multiple forms allows me to choose the format that works best for any given idea. 

I don’t always have enough time to work on everything every day, but I carve out time each week to work on creative projects. It’s important to be intentional about continuing to grow in each area over time. 

Looking back, which creative achievement are you most proud of—and why?

I’m most proud of getting into Juilliard. It was a dream I had since I first started playing flute and harp. During the year of my auditions, I reached a new level of playing that felt like the equivalent of fluency in a language. I could fully express myself musically and had achieved the technical mastery I had been working toward for years. What made it even more meaningful was being able to maintain a high level of playing under immense pressure.

If you could collaborate with any one of your listed influences—living or not—who would it be and on what kind of project?

Michael Crichton. I’ve always admired how he built such an impressive career as a novelist, screenwriter, director, and producer, all after going to medical school. Like Crichton, I enjoy weaving real science and technology into my plots and exploring how today’s discoveries might influence future advancements. If I could collaborate with him, I would want to co-write a feature script and have him or Spielberg direct it.

Are there any upcoming novels that we should look out for? 

Yes, Whispered is my upcoming novel, which I hope to publish in the near future. It’s an espionage thriller about a disgraced CIA operative who investigates the seemingly senseless murder of his brother and subsequently uncovers a neo-Nazi plot to overthrow the German government.

What advice would you give to artists trying to navigate multiple creative paths at once?

I think it’s important to pursue multiple creative paths, even though conventional wisdom says to focus on just one. It’s true that mastery takes time, but exploring different disciplines can make you more well-rounded, which almost always benefits your work. It also helps you figure out what you truly love and keeps the day-to-day process interesting. 

Structure also matters. I recommend setting a schedule so that each creative path gets the time it deserves. It doesn’t have to be rigid, but consistency is key. 

Industry relationships also play a big role. In entertainment especially, being active in one area can open doors in another. For instance, acting on a set might lead to writing opportunities. Producing a project might connect you with collaborators for another. Each path can end up supporting the others. 

Book Information:

Double Crossed

After reading about unusual autopsy findings of a recently deceased senator, President Jeremy Lewis opens an investigation into what is soon revealed to be an apparent foiled attempt to infiltrate the administration at the highest level through the use of medical and technological capabilities far beyond what is known to exist. President Lewis then enlists his childhood best friend and tech-savvy entrepreneur, Ian Richards, to assist him in the endeavor.

This same death arouses the suspicions of Ross Blanchard, a relentless reporter for The New York Times, who avails himself of equally sophisticated technology in his own investigation. The intelligence community and Blanchard ultimately cooperate, culminating in a daring raid on a clandestine laboratory in the most unlikely of locations. But is this really the end of it?

Buy on Amazon

Mind the Gap

After the sudden loss of his father, Rocco Amiri, a misguided, rebellious young adult, begins spending his nights running through working New York City subway tunnels, climbing bridges, and exploring rooftops with his friends.

As he tries to uncover information about his late father and struggles to make ends meet in the city that never sleeps, Rocco slowly establishes a presence in the “outlaw Instagrammer” community with his best friend, Thalia. However, Rocco must soon decide whether indulging his passion for photography and satisfying his curiosity about his father are worth the risk.

Mind the Gap unmasks the clandestine New York City urban community and tells the story of the fine line between safety and danger—one easily crossed by those who seek dangerous thrills.

Buy on Amazon

Q&A with Kandi Steiner

Your books have resonated with so many readers, some calling themselves “Whiskey Girls”—do you remember the moment you realized this was going to be your career?

When I released Revelry, which was the book I published about six months after A Love Letter to Whiskey, it shot up the Amazon charts. That was my third Amazon bestseller in a row. That was the first time I felt like this whole writing thing could actually be my career. It gave me the confidence to quit my full time job and pursue writing all in.

You’ve written everything from slow burns to angsty heartbreakers. How do you decide what kind of emotional journey a book will take? Was there a story that pushed you outside your comfort zone?

I am a mood writer as much as I am a mood reader — I just go with whatever my heart is telling me it needs! Sometimes, I'm in the mood for a fun, low stakes sports romance. Other times, I want to explore the human condition and how love can get complicated — fast. 

All of my books have pushed me in different ways, but one that really challenged me emotionally and pushed me to sharpen my writing chops was the What He Doesn't Know/What He Always Knew duet. It was my first time writing a duet and I was also surprising the reader with a third POV and a twist at the end of book one. It was difficult to pull off my vision, but I'm so proud of how it turned out in the end.

You’re known for creating emotionally raw and deeply human characters. Which of your characters has stayed with you the most, and why?

All of my characters take a piece of me when they leave my brain, and they all embed themselves into my heart forever. But one character who really sank his teeth into my soul was Emery from On the Way to You. He was profound and deeply emotional and I enjoyed the challenge he gave me to write him.

A Love Letter to Whiskey has such a passionate and polarizing response from fans—what was it like writing a story with that level of emotional complexity?

This book put me through the wringer just as much as it did my readers. I was consumed with the story, writing day and night and dreaming about it until it was complete. I cried, I squirmed, I felt all the gut-wrenching feelings that readers experienced. I will never forget what it felt like to lose myself in that book, and I firmly believe I wrote it at the perfect time in my life to do it correctly. I couldn't write it again today — even if I tried!

If you had to introduce a reader to your work with just one book, which one would you pick and why?

A Love Letter to Whiskey is always my number one choice, because it's the book that I feel captures the spirit of my writing and shows my style. 

You’ve cultivated a strong reader community. How has that influenced your career?

I am convinced I have the best readers in the world. They are loyal and enthusiastic about what they read, which leads to more readers finding my books. Without the readers who read, love, review, and post about my work, I wouldn't be here. I continually express my gratitude to them and remind them how much I appreciate them spending their hard earned money on my books when I know they have so many to choose from. 

Two of your most iconic novels are coming to bookstores for the very first time this summer, The Wrong Game followed by The Right Player. From what I hear, you have some exciting news coming this Fall. Are you able to share anything with us?

I'm so thrilled about The Wrong Game and The Right Player coming to bookstores this summer. And this fall, A Love Letter to Whiskey will join them — and it will re-publish in a stunning new deluxe edition with sprayed edges and a foiled cover. I can't wait!

If one of your books were turned into a movie or show, who would you dream cast in the lead roles?

It's my ultimate dream to see A Love Letter to Whiskey made into a movie. Since I dream-cased this book in 2016, I always saw Theo James and Zoe Saldaña. However, if it were to become a movie now, I'd want to find new-to-me actors and actresses who are more in the age range of B and Jamie and could play the role of a high school student all the way through an adult in their 30s. 

Do you have any advice for aspiring authors?

My advice to aspiring authors boils down to four things: be unapologetically you, treat writing like a committed relationship, surround yourself with a genuine support tribe, and live a story-worthy life. Write with intent: outline, set measurable goals, and use tools like PaceMaker. Edit ruthlessly. Market yourself authentically — people connect to real you. Budget wisely and expect the long haul. Embrace gratitude, prepare for rough patches with mindset tools, and never stop writing — even bad words count. Ultimately, believe in yourself; your voice and your story are worth showing the world.

Q&A with Simon Tolkien, The Palace At The End Of The Sea

You are the grandson of J.R.R. Tolkien. How did that affect your writing career?

It’s hard to analyze one’s own character and development, but I think that two vital clues in my case are  that I was born the grandson of one of the most famous and well-loved writers of the 20th century and that  I never wrote a word of fiction until I was forty-one, even though I clearly had the capacity to do so. I  have no doubt in my mind that the two are linked. 

I was not a confident person in the first half of my life. I was unsure of my identity and self-conscious in  the way I expressed myself, and this fed into an undermining sense of being overshadowed by my  grandfather and his immense achievements. But like a pressure cooker inside, my desire to write  ultimately forced itself to the surface in the years following the Millenium. I cut back on my work as a  criminal law barrister and began my first novel, and when it was turned down, I simply wrote another.  Suddenly I was determined when before I had hidden away. I developed my talent, learning as I went,  progressing from plot-driven crime thrillers to historical fiction in which the characters became as real to  me as actual friends. 

My sense of being overshadowed by my grandfather’s achievements had fortunately never poisoned me  against The Lord of the Rings. I have always loved Middle-earth and I read the books aloud to both my  children. As a novelist, I have never been tempted to write fantasy, but I was attracted by the realism of my grandfather’s writing and the vitality of his storytelling. Whether hobbit or human, his characters are  flawed, facing hard choices with extraordinary reserves of courage, and these were qualities I looked for  in my own creations. 

My grandfather died when I was fourteen, and with No Man’s Land, I feel that I reached the end of my  journey to find him again and relate to him in a positive way. After fifteen years as a novelist, I had  sufficient confidence in my writing ability to try to bring to life the experience of the British soldiers like  my grandfather, who fought on the Western Front in the First World War, and to begin to understand the  effect that that experience had on his imagination. As I wrote in the dedication, I felt that my book  honored his memory, and I thought that he would have been proud of me. At last, my grandfather and his  achievements had become an inspiration and not a block to my self-expression. I felt I was standing  beside him and not behind him as I turned my thoughts to my next writing chapter: New York in the Great  Depression and the Spanish Civil War.  

How did you approach the research process for the duology - The Palace at the End of the Sea and The Room of Lost Steps?

My first three books were in the crime genre and plotting and writing took much more time than research.  But the reverse has become true since I switched to historical fiction, and research for the duology ended  up taking more than three years! 

I knew that I was taking on a serious challenge with the Spanish Civil War. Spanish politics in the 1930s  were fiendishly complicated and this has meant that there is a huge amount of historical study of the  period but almost no novels. I read these studies because I knew I needed to understand the full picture if I was going to be able to simplify it and make it accessible to my readers, and I care deeply that the history  in my books is accurate. 

I realized that I was going to have to strike a fine balance between painting the relevant historical  background but without ever allowing the novels to become a history lesson, because the provision of  information for its own sake takes the reader out of the fictional world I am trying to create and make real.  It helped that I was writing a coming-of-age story in which the reader could join my hero in his journey  towards understanding Spain. 

I knew that what mattered most, however, was bringing the relevant history to life, and so I read all the  memoirs I could get my hands on, including the accounts written by the survivors of the Lincoln  Battalion, searching for vivid passages that would inspire me. It was one thing to know that 2% of the  population owned half the land of Spain in 1936; it was quite another to see the “bent-over men coming  down the paths from the hills with tied-up bundles of firewood and pine cones on their backs”, looking  like “some strange species of tree creature … not human at all.”  

And the books’ scope and ambition grew organically as I worked, increasing the amount and diversity of  information that I needed. It began as a novel about a War and ended eight years later as a portrait of an  era with settings in New York, England and Spain. 

Why is your novel called The Palace at the End of the Sea?

The palace at the end of the sea is Ellis Island, the famous immigrant inspection and processing station in  New York Harbor. Early in the novel, the hero’s father describes to his son how he and his parents arrived  there from Poland at the end of the 19th century, and how fearful they felt about whether they would be  allowed into America. He tells him that on the ferry afterward, he “looked up at the towers of Manhattan  and the stars blinking,” and it was the happiest moment of his life. 

The boy, Theo, sees the red-brick immigration building and its towers from the boat when he leaves New  York at the end of Part One, and recalls his father’s words, causing him to reflect on how his father  followed his dreams and earned his fortune, only to lose everything in the Great Depression.  

Theo can see through his father’s eyes that Ellis Island must have seemed like a palace after the long hard  voyage across the Atlantic, but its shine seems tarnished to him now by the hardship and misfortune that  he and his family have experienced in the Depression, and the partly ironic title reflects the most  important theme of the duology – the relationship between hope and loss, illusion and disillusion, while  also focusing the reader on the city of New York where Theo grows up and begins his journey. 

Why does The Palace at the End of the Sea begin in New York? What did you learn about the city in the 30s from writing your novel?

All my books before the duology were written from a British perspective, and after finishing No Man’s  Land, I wanted to take on the challenge of making my next hero an American. I soon realized that  nationality wasn’t enough; I was going to need to show him growing up in America and his character  being formed by that experience. I fixed on New York as the setting. It was an easy decision to make  because I had always been fascinated by the city, exploring its streets and avenues until I was footsore on  many previous visits. And the choice also made sense because I knew that my hero was going to fight  with the Lincoln Battalion in the Spanish Civil War, and New York was where so many of the volunteers  came from.

I began to research the city in the Thirties and was soon enthralled by the vivid variety of life that I  encountered. I read about the Jewish immigrants who were worked to the bone in the garment sweatshops  on the Lower East Side, and I was moved by the suffering of the unemployed in the Great Depression,  queuing at the soup kitchens in the Bowery while the glittering skyscrapers multiplied in number above  their heads, indifferent to their plight. Rich and poor, capitalist and communist, men and women of every  color and creed, all caught up together in the melting pot of the great city. 

I listened to the jazz music and watched the movies that New Yorkers listened to ninety years ago, and I  tried to picture the speakeasies and the bath houses, and imagine the gaudy savage joy that they felt when  they escaped for a day to Coney Island or watched Babe Ruth set Yankee Stadium alight. 

All these strands came together in my mind to form the story of my hero’s father who rose from rags to  riches, living the American dream, only to watch all that he had built fall to pieces in the Depression. The  experience of this calamity and its terrible results mold his son’s character, setting him on the paths that  will ultimately lead him to the war in Spain. 

What is your hero, Theo Sterling’s greatest quality?

Courage. An alternative title for The Palace at the End of the Sea was The Anatomy of Courage. Theo  cannot and will not back away from a challenge, even when he knows it’s going to get him into trouble.  He wants to run, not walk. He makes a life for himself and his mother in New York in the most adverse  circumstances but then runs after his future stepfather even though he knows that it will likely mean that  he will have to give that life up. He jeopardizes everything that he has achieved at school in England  when he joins his friend, Esmond, in a violent anti-Fascist demonstration in London, and risks torture and  imprisonment when he participates in an attempted anarchist outrage in the village in Spain to which he  has moved with his mother and stepfather. He constantly gets ahead of himself and lets his heart rule his  head and then has to pay the consequences. But nothing can shake his belief that he can change the world,  and he is forever inspired by a restless imagination, a capacity for intense friendship, and an instinctive  response to beauty. He falls in love with the firebrand anarchist girl, Maria, through the prism of the love  he already feels for rural Spain and continues to believe in the face of all the odds that in the end they can  be together. 

Why did you set part two of The Palace at the End of the Sea in a British Catholic boarding school?

The duology is a coming-of-age story and so I knew that my hero, Theo would have to go to school, and  early on in the planning stage, I decided that it should be a Catholic boarding school called Saint  Gregory’s located in rural England. 

Later, I became nervous about this because I myself went to a similar school, Downside, in the 1970s and  did not do well there, and I was anxious about whether this experience would lead me to become  unconsciously satirical, turning the fictional school into a vehicle for exorcizing or rewriting my own  history, and so losing sight of Theo’s development as a person in an utterly foreign environment that had  nothing in common with all that he had known before in America. 

But perhaps awareness of the pitfalls kept me on the straight and narrow, and I am pleased with the end  result. Like me at the time, Theo is in search of an identity, but unlike me, he ultimately makes a success  of his schooldays, while having formative experiences there that inform his later decisions in life. Thus,  

his struggle against the school bully provides the foundation for his visceral hatred of Fascism, and the  charismatic hold that his communist friend, Esmond, exerts over him, plants the seed of his belief that he  can change the world.

And contrary to what I expected, Theo’s experience of Catholicism at the school turns out to be largely  positive, and the humane influence of his housemaster, Father Laurence, is an antidote not only to  Esmond’s extremism but also to the unquestioning emotion of his mother’s religion that Theo is repelled  by, especially after the family move to Spain. 

I enjoyed writing about school, and so perhaps good fiction is indeed good therapy! 

Why is part 3 of The Palace at the End of the Sea set in Spain?

I knew from the outset that the book would be a coming-of-age story in which Theo, its American hero,  would join the Lincoln Battalion to try and stop the Spanish Fascists from destroying the Republican  government that had been democratically elected to reverse centuries of social and economic injustice. But as I developed the plot, I came to realize that it was not going to be enough for Theo to volunteer to  fight for an idea of justice in the same way that the vast majority of the Lincolns did; he also needed to  have a personal visceral stake in the War that would make it impossible for him to stay home. This meant  that he would first have to live in Spain before the War and fall in love with the country. 

So, I went to the primary sources and read all I could about what rural Spain was like in the mid-1930s: a  world unchanged since mediaeval times that has since vanished almost without trace. I found out how the  people lived and dressed and ate, and I tried to understand the centuries-old customs and beliefs that  governed their lives. Street by street, square by square, I built an Andalusian village and called it Los  Olivos, and in the end, I could see it and smell it and hear it, just like Theo, and experience the terrible  injustice that lay beneath its beautiful surface, destroying it like a canker from within. 

The Palace at the End of the Sea begins with the hero, Theo, meeting his Jewish grandparents for the first time. Why did you include a Jewish dimension in the story?

I have always been fascinated by Jewish culture, and the history of the Holocaust has haunted me ever  since I first heard about it when I was a boy. Later, as a writer of historical fiction set in the first half of  the 20th century, I have been interested in including the Jewish experience in my stories. 

The key to my novel, The King of Diamonds, turns on the true identity of a diamond dealer who may have  helped Jews to find safe passage out of occupied Belgium, or may instead have betrayed them to the  Nazis, in order to steal the jewels that they hid in their clothing when they escaped. This storyline enabled  me to explore the fate of the twenty-five thousand Jews who were deported to Auschwitz from the transit  camp at Mechelen near Antwerp between 1942 and 1944. 

In The Palace at the End of the Sea, I have written about the Jewish immigrants to New York in the early  20th century, who worked in the garment sweatshops of the Lower East Side. The hero’s father has left this  world behind and renounced his Jewish identity by marrying a Catholic, but in the first chapter of the  book, his son, Theo, meets his grandparents for the first time and finds out that he has a Jewish family  history of which he had been completely ignorant up to then. Theo’s father tells his son that he must  forget all that he has seen and heard, but instead Theo hoards his memories like treasure, and years later,  one of his principal reasons for volunteering to fight in the Spanish Civil War is the need he feels to stand  up against Hitler’s persecution of the Jews. In Spain, Theo is finally able to connect with his Jewish  heritage and make that a real part of his identity. 

Why does the Catholic religion play such a significant role in The Palace at the End of the Sea?

The Catholic religion plays a pivotal role in the book, because it is at the root of the broken relationship  between Theo and his mother, Elena. Her faith is emotional, born of a childhood in Mexico which came to  a sudden end when her parents were murdered by socialist government soldiers, forcing her to flee the  country. But her son is a “child of New York City, where everything was man-made, and what you saw  was what you got.” He doubts and questions everything, and feels smothered by his mother’s heartfelt  certainties. 

The tension between them escalates when they move to a village in Andalusia in Part 3. Elena believes  that she has at last returned to her spiritual home, but the Spanish Church has little in common with its  persecuted Mexican counterpart. It is immensely rich and identifies with the ruling class – the great  landowners and the army. The poor feel that it has betrayed them and have turned to the anarchists who preach that religion is a lie used to deceive them and keep them in submission and ignorance. Freedom  will only come “when the last marquis has been strangled with the guts of the last priest.” As the tension  between the haves and the have-nots escalates, Theo and his mother move further apart and their love for  each other cannot bridge the rift that has opened up between them. 

Who was your favorite character to write in The Palace at the End of the Sea?

This is a hard question. Theo is the (flawed) hero of the novel, but I found Esmond de Lisle the most  interesting character to create, partly because he is contradictory and elusive, so that like Theo, I could  never be sure of what he was really thinking. Theo meets Esmond at school in England and quickly falls  under his charismatic spell. Esmond has the best sense of humor of all the characters in the duology, and  he has a genuine affection for Theo, but Theo detects a coldness in him. Esmond is his own person and  doesn’t care what others think of him, but he can’t feel what others feel. His faith in communism is as  strong as Theo’s mother’s is in God, but he expresses it cerebrally instead of emotionally like her. 

I named Esmond after Esmond Romilly, who was Winston Churchill’s nephew and lived an extraordinary  life until his tragic early death at the age of twenty-three. Romilly attended an English boarding school  where he rebelled, publishing a left-wing magazine that achieved a national circulation. At eighteen, he  joined the International Brigades and fought in the successful defense of Madrid against the Fascists, and  then wrote a book, Boadilla vividly describing his experiences. Back in England, he fell in love with  Jessica Mitford, who was one of the famous Mitford sisters. They eloped and spent a year travelling  around America before he joined the Royal Canadian Air Force as a navigator. His airplane was shot  down over the North Sea in 1941 and his body was never recovered. 

Esmond Romilly’s life was an inspiration for some of the events in the duology, and his charisma was a  quality that I have tried to convey in my portrait of Esmond de Lisle, but they are otherwise very different  characters, not least because Esmond Romilly was never prepared to fully embrace communism, which  makes him more akin to Theo than his fictional namesake.  

Thee are not many novels about The Spanish Civil War but it’s a topic you took on. Why did you want to write about it?

The kernel of the idea came to me a long time ago when I read an article about the Abraham Lincoln  Brigade – Americans who volunteered in the last years of the 1930s to fight for the democratically elected  Spanish Republic, that was under attack from the Spanish army supported by Hitler and Mussolini.  Thousands of them from many different walks of life – university graduates and mill hands, teachers and  truck drivers, even a governor’s son – crossed the sea without any previous experience of soldiering and  risked their lives to fight for their ideals; many never came back. I was astonished by their courage and sacrifice, and I thought that their story would make a wonderful subject for a novel. But I had other  projects to fulfill at the tim,e and so I filed the Lincolns away in the lumber room of my memory. 

Years later, I finished my novel, No Man’s Land that takes place between 1910 and 1919, and cast around  for what I should write about next. My previous book, Orders from Berlin, had been set during the  London Blitz of 1940, and I therefore looked to see if I could find an interesting subject that lay between  the two world wars. It didn’t take me long to light on the Spanish Civil War. I remembered the Lincolns  and thought that they could be a fascinating way into the subject, tying in with my wish to try and write  for the first time from an American perspective, having emigrated to the States eight years before. 

Full of enthusiasm, I began to read Hugh Thomas’s magisterial history of the Spanish Civil War, and one  third of the way in, I felt my head spinning as I tried to make sense of the extreme complexity of 1930s  Spanish politics. Drowning in a sea of acronyms, I began to understand why novelists since Hemingway  had steered clear of the war. I thought of giving up but then dismissed the idea. The inaccessibility of the  subject matter actually attracted me. I knew that beneath the surface there was a vital world waiting for  me, peopled by men and women who had sacrificed everything to try and change it for the better, and as I  pushed forward, I became determined that their stories should not be forgotten. It took me more than eight  years to complete the journey, but I am happier than I can say that I stayed the course. 

What is your writing process? What different stages did the duology go through in it’s development?

I try to be methodical. I chose my subject - the Spanish Civil War – and read the standard histories of the  period and then began mapping out the barebones of a plot in my mind. This took many months and was,  I think, the hardest part of the process, because I worried, as I have with previous books, that I wouldn’t  be able to come up with something that I believed could work. Being an author is a lonely business and  the awareness that the book doesn’t exist until you invent it can be very daunting. I spent many days on  the sofa, gazing sightlessly into the middle distance, going up blind alleys. Patience is key and eventually,  many months later, I felt ready to assemble what I had in a synopsis and send it to my publisher for  discussion and approval.  

With the synopsis agreed, I began the research process which involved travelling to relevant locations and reading historical studies and memoirs so as to build up a comprehensive database of relevant information  on my computer. Amazon was an amazing resource because it enabled me to buy out-of-print books, so  that I now possess an almost complete library of the Lincoln volunteers’ accounts of their experiences in  the Civil War. It was hard to know when to stop the research and start writing because there was always  more information available - another treasure trove waiting just around the corner! 

I wrote the books sequentially from beginning to end, expanding out the planning documents and  chronologies as the scope of the story grew. The end seemed very far away in the first year, and I had to  force myself to think of the writing journey as segmented, with each of the six parts of the duology an end  in itself. I imagined myself as a mountaineer climbing between base camps, keeping his eyes averted from  the distant summit. 

But I did finally reach the end and opened a bottle of champagne, before beginning the long process of  revision and editing, which brought its own challenges. I was very lucky to have the help of two  wonderful developmental editors, Beena Kamlani and then David Downing, but I had to discipline myself  to listen to them and evaluate all their suggestions on their merits, overcoming the protectiveness I felt for  my creation. Book as child!

And then one day, eight years after I began, everything was finished and I received the beautiful advance  reader copies from my publishers, held them in my hands, and felt an intense sense of fulfilment and  gratitude. For better or worse, I had created the books from nothing. They were the best I could do; they  had become a vital part of who I am.  

What do you enjoy most about writing?

I have never been any good with my hands, and for many years, I felt frustrated that I had no outlet for my  creativity, so it makes me very happy now that I can create multi-faceted characters who exist  independently of me. I believe in them and can share their hopes and fears, their successes and their  failures. 

Over time, my novels have increased in scope and ambition, and the duology is a portrait of an era set in  three countries over a nine-year period. They require detailed research and preparation, and I enjoy using  the skills I learned as a historian and a lawyer to assemble my diverse material and develop it into an  organic whole. 

Sometimes, when I am writing, I arrive at a point where the narrative seamlessly connects with something  else in the story that I hadn’t seen before. At such times, I feel that an unseen hand is at work, guiding me.  Writing becomes alchemy, at least for a moment.  

What about historical fiction as a genre appeals to you as a writer?

As a child, I loved history. My mother had inherited a huge leather-bound book, Haydn’s Dictionary of  Dates, and I would pass days reading the entries and building pictures in my mind of who the Moghuls  were and what it would have been like to have lived in the Khanate of the Golden Horde. I could see Ivan  the Terrible when I closed my eyes or at least my version of him and imagine Vasco da Gama’s terrified  sailors rounding the Cape of Good Hope as the waves battered their ship. The past was another country, as  alive as mine, and infinitely more wonderful than the sleepy English village where I grew up.  

At school, history was my best subject, and I went on to study it at university. But I was always frustrated  by the way it concentrated on the causes and results of events, avoiding the visceral reality of what had  actually happened in the heat of revolution or battle. I preferred the great 19th century novels that made  history real – the Brontë sisters and Dickens, Dumas and Tolstoy. 

Twenty years later, I gave up being a barrister to become a novelist. I began with what I knew, writing  courtroom dramas, but over time I became confident enough to leave crime behind and write character driven stories set in the first half of the 20th century. Finally, I felt that I had found my calling, bringing  the past to life, so that I could recapture that sense of wonder I had as a child and convey it to my readers. 

What are some recurring themes in your fiction writing?

In my first novel, Final Witness, the teenage hero believes that his father has married a woman who  conspired to murder his mother; in The Inheritance, a young man, Stephen Cade is on trial for the murder  of his father, and faces execution by hanging; in No Man’s Land, Adam Raine loses his parents in  traumatic circumstances and must search for an identity in a hostile and alien environment. And in my two  new novels, Theo Sterling suffers devastating losses and disillusionment while trying to find meaning and  fulfilment in a broken world. 

I think this focus on the struggles of young men without siblings in their teenage years is no accident. I  consider myself now to be a determined person who works hard to accomplish clear-set goals - I couldn’t  have written the novels I have over the last twenty-five years without a strong sense of discipline and  purpose. But, as an only child of divorced parents and later as a teenager, I was very different. I lacked confidence and was often unsuccessful in my endeavors, and I think that my fiction writing has been a  way for me to connect back to my younger experience and explore where a search for identity can take a  person who is deeply unsure of themselves. 

My interest in the vulnerability of the young has also led me to write about the effects of trauma on their  psychology. My heroes suffer from family estrangement and sudden loss of friends and parents, and in my  more recent novels, they fight in terrible conditions on the battlefields of the Western Front and the  Spanish Civil War. Throughout, I have been interested in exploring the positive and negative effects of  these experiences on the minds and souls of those who are still in a formative stage of their development. 

About The Palace at the End of the Sea:

A young man comes of age and crosses continents in search of an identity—and a cause—at the dawn of the Spanish Civil War in a thrilling, timely, and emotional historical saga.

New York City, 1929. Young Theo Sterling’s world begins to unravel as the Great Depression exerts its icy grip. He finds it hard to relate to his parents: His father, a Jewish self-made businessman, refuses to give up on the American dream, and his mother, a refugee from religious persecution in Mexico, holds fast to her Catholic faith. When disaster strikes the family, Theo must learn who he is. A charismatic school friend and a firebrand girl inspire him to believe he can fight Fascism and change the world, but each rebellion comes at a higher price, forcing Theo to question these ideologies too.

From New York’s Lower East Side to an English boarding school to an Andalusian village in the foothills of the Sierra Nevada, Theo’s harrowing journey from boy to man is set against a backdrop of societies torn apart from within, teetering on the edge of a terrible war to which Theo is compulsively drawn like a moth to a flame.

Buy on Amazon Kindle | Audible | Hardcover | Paperback | Bookshop.org

Q&A with Tabitha Bailey, Standing Up by Mary L. Devine

Your memoir takes readers through harrowing experiences of domestic violence. What made you decide to share your story so openly?

I never set out to write Standing Up so openly. The story took on a life of its own, evolving into something far different from what I initially envisioned. At first, I wrote to heal, but shame and fear of judgment kept me from telling the full truth. As I considered publishing, I softened the details, hesitant to expose the raw reality of what I felt I had let happen.

For years, I struggled to shape my story, setting it aside again and again. But as I revisited my past—examining the abuse, how it unfolded, and the emotions I experienced—I realized that what I felt most wasn’t sadness or pain, but accomplishment. I had survived. I refused to see myself as a victim, and I didn’t want others to see me that way either. The story changed, and with it, my purpose.

I no longer wrote just for myself—I wrote for the women still trapped in the cycle of abuse, the ones who feel powerless, afraid, and alone. My goal became clear: to help them see their own strength, to encourage them to take even the smallest step—toward the door, toward freedom, toward a future where they are in control. I know how overwhelming that first step can feel. But once I glimpsed the possibility of something better, that hope became my driving force.

Looking back, what were some of the key moments that helped you realize you needed to leave your abuser?

Over a few years, he slowly cut me off from the people who mattered most. He convinced me to quit my job to help with his business, sold my car so I couldn’t go anywhere without him, and moved us over an hour away from my family and friends. Little by little, he took away my independence until I felt completely trapped.

What finally pushed me to leave? Angels—real ones, here on earth. After one especially violent attack, where he injured my eye and left a deep cut between them, he carried me into the emergency room. That’s where I met Sarah, my first earthly angel. She convinced me to let her call my brother, Russ—my second angel. That phone call was the first real step toward getting out, even though I didn’t fully realize it at the time. Looking back, it was the moment everything started to change.

You describe discovering a reservoir of resilience within yourself—what were some of the biggest factors that helped you survive and heal?

Accepting help was a huge obstacle for me. I was ashamed to need it and dreaded having to explain why.

My next angel was my favorite, funny Aunt Ruth. She was diagnosed with cancer around the same time I found myself homeless, and I moved in with her for the final six months of her life. Helping her helped me. As I spent those last months by her side, I started to feel more in control of my own life. She taught me about living, even as she was dying.

When she passed, she left me what she called “money for karate classes so I could defend myself in my next relationship.” By then, I had started recognizing those angel moments, so when I began hearing commercials on the radio for martial arts training, I took it as a sign and signed up. I became physically stronger and, more importantly, regained my confidence.

Your second marriage brought new challenges, despite initial hope. How did your past experiences shape how you approached those difficulties?

I still hadn’t taken a hard look at my role in the struggles of my first marriage, so I made plenty of mistakes in my second.

Unfortunately, I didn’t have much experience with addiction—aside from what I had learned from my first husband, and that was short-lived. My second husband was great at hiding it, so I had no idea he had fallen off the wagon as early as he did.

By the time it became painfully obvious, he had already been arrested. I was in my final year of college, working toward a degree in criminal justice, while he was headed in the opposite direction. I wasn’t willing to accept the lies, the infidelity, or keep making excuses for him. And when I was done, I was done.

What inspired you to become a detective, especially in the domestic violence unit?

I met Mary Friswell at the martial arts studio. She was incredibly talented—she had even earned a wildcard spot for the Barcelona Olympics. Everyone respected her, including the male competitors, who practically revered her.

Mary was also a police officer, and when I shared my story with her about how I ended up there, she took me under her wing. One night, she invited me on a ride-along while she was on patrol. I was hooked the moment our first call turned out to be a domestic complaint.

How did your personal history influence the way you approached cases? Did it make the work more difficult, or did it give you a unique sense of purpose?

My past experiences gave me a unique advantage. I understood the challenges from a victim’s perspective and had a different way of framing potential solutions. I also faced the same frustrations as my coworkers when victims refused to file charges or show up in court. But one thing I would never ask was, “Why don’t you just leave?”

It’s never that simple. But unless the abuser and victim seek professional help, leaving is often the only real solution. I understood that many victims were financially dependent on their partners, had children to consider, and were emotionally drained from years of abuse. The weight of it all made leaving feel impossible.

With every victim I spoke to, I planted seeds of hope—the one thing they were missing. Ironically, hope is also what keeps many victims stuck. They hope things will go back to how they were in the beginning, before the abuse. They convince themselves it’s just the circumstances—money struggles, family stress, or even their own fault. I shouldn’t have…

I made sure they knew they weren’t alone. I connected them with victim advocates, safe housing options, financial aid, and other resources to help them take that first step toward leaving a violent relationship.

When you encountered a case that mirrored your own experience, how did you navigate the emotional and professional challenges?

When I was assaulted, I didn’t know I was pregnant. I was only about seven or eight weeks along, and because of the attack, lost the baby. It was a devastating time. So when I met the victim who was my age, and learned her boyfriend had dragged her off the couch, shoved her against the wall, and choked her my stomach lurched. Our experience was eerily similar. She lost her baby, too.

When I heard the details of her case, I felt queezy. I sat across from her, sweating through the entire interview, reliving my experience. But what really got to me was that she didn’t want him prosecuted—even though this was the second child he’d killed this way. I felt so many emotions at once: anger at her, frustration at the system, shame for not pursuing justice when I had the chance in my own situation.

During that time, running became my escape and it helped me stay grounded through the tough times. I ran my way through it, burning through a couple of pairs of running shoes, trying to outrun the demons until the day of trial.

In the end, he took a plea deal—Abuse of a Pregnant Female, a felony. The prosecution was relieved, since she refused to testify against him, but I wasn’t. Two babies had died at his hands, and his sentence was 18 months in prison and a year of supervised release. And then? They’d be back together.

I watched her as she left the courtroom. She didn’t look relieved. She looked tired—completely drained. And I knew that look too well. I had worn it myself more times than I could count. It was the face of someone who had fought battle after battle and had nothing left to give.

That’s when my anger faded, and my heart went out to her. I bit my lip, feeling something I hadn’t expected: compassion.

How do you think law enforcement and society, in general, can better support victims of domestic violence?

That’s the million dollar question. Abuse hides in the dark. Shine a light on it for what it is—cowardly. Abusers don’t usually pick fights with their bosses, neighbors, or coworkers. They choose their wives and partners—people they see as easy targets – a sure thing. Stop blaming the victims and start holding abusers accountable for their actions. 

Domestic violence is cyclical. Abusers are often exposed to violence in their own homes, which teaches children how to behave—whether to submit or to become abusers themselves. More programs are needed to stop abuse at its source: the abusers. Teaching anger management and conflict resolution skills at a young age can help reduce the number of kids who grow up to use their fists, guns, or words to hurt the people they love.

Writing a memoir about trauma can be emotionally exhausting. What was the hardest part of putting your story on paper?

The shame of allowing it to happen to me – of having to admit that I stayed when I ‘should have’ left. Being honest leaves you wide open to ridicule. I condidered keeping some parts out of it, because it was embarassing and I struggled with the question, “Does it really need to be in there?” Some people will be hurt when they read my book, but there are amazing life savers in it, too, and both stories deserve to be told. 

What do you hope readers—both survivors and those unfamiliar with domestic violence—take away from Standing Up?

One in three women and one in five men will experience abuse in their lifetime, and nearly everyone knows someone who has been affected. If you or someone you love has been a victim, the most important thing you can do is start the conversation with compassion. Ask gentle, open-ended questions, and let the conversation unfold naturally. Be mindful of your own emotional limits—only take in what you’re able to handle, and remember, the victim should never have to comfort you.

Educate yourself about domestic violence. Learn about the services available so you can offer informed support. If you’re unsure whether what you’re experiencing is abuse, I’ve included a self-assessment guide at the back of this book that may help. You’ll also find resource pages with numerous support options for people from all walks of life.

No one should have to face abuse alone. Help begins with understanding, and change starts with compassion.

This is no longer just my story—it belongs to every woman who has been told she’s not strong enough, who has been made to believe she has no way out. You do. And when you take that first step, no matter how small, you are already standing up.

About Standing Up by Mary L. Devine:

For true-crime fans, a gripping memoir of a domestic violence survivor who becomes a police detective in the domestic violence unit and is forced to face her demons when her first major case mirrors her own violent assault.

Standing Up invites you on an exhilarating journey with a woman who refuses to be defined by her scars. A pulse-pounding chronicle of survival against all odds, this memoir takes readers along on a plunge into the chilling depths of abusive relationships.

At the tender age of twenty-three, Mary Sweeney-Devine unwittingly stumbled into the clutches of her abuser, igniting anguish and despair. With each heart-wrenching trial, including a hospital visit, she unearthed a reservoir of resilience she didn’t know she possessed. But just when she thought she had weathered the storm, a second marriage to a recovering alcoholic unleashed a tempest of secrets and unforeseen challenges.

Yet Devine emerged from the darkness, fueled by an unyielding determination and a fierce spirit. With the help of unexpected allies, determination, and a sprinkling of humor, she navigated the treacherous terrain of her past—and reclaimed her life with courage. Offering hope to those ensnared in the vicious cycle of abuse, Standing Up is a riveting testament to Devine’s indomitable spirit and a gripping saga that will leave you breathlessly rooting for the victory of the human heart over adversity.

Buy on Amazon Kindle | Paperback | Bookshop.org

Q&A with PS Conway, Life Sucks: Memories and Introspections During the Great Covid Lockdown

What made you decide to document the lockdown in this way—through essays soaked in satire and cynicism?  

The lockdown didn’t feel like a chapter in a memoir. It felt like a fever dream that needed to be exorcised in real time. Essays soaked in satire and cynicism were my way of screaming into the void while hitting it in the face with a pie. The world had turned absurd, and writing straight wouldn’t cut it. I wasn’t trying to document history. I was trying to survive it with my sanity (mostly) intact. Satire gave me a pressure valve. My cynical voice gave me a shield. And together, they let me say the kinds of things I couldn’t admit in a grocery store, whispering “Rosebud” in the mango aisle, without getting arrested.

You describe your style as “literary comedic nihilism.” How did that voice evolve during the lockdown, and did it surprise even you?  

People have always told me I’m funny, sometimes a little childish, sometimes just absurd, but in the lockdown, literary comedic nihilism came out of nowhere like a late-night infomercial. I invented this new subgenre of Humor for the book because, honestly, there was no other way to make sense of what was happening. With LCN, you learn a little, laugh a lot, and then forget about it all - because it never really mattered anyway. It was the perfect fit for surviving a pandemic: find a truth in the chaos, toss it in a blender with some laughs, and hit “purée.” Who needs meaning or truth when facts are now just science’s opinions?

These essays originated on your blog Life Sucks. Laugh Here. What made you decide to gather them into a book? And why now?

The essays didn’t exactly ask to be a book. They kind of elbowed their way in. Life Sucks Laugh Here started as a way to cope with the absurdity of the 2020 lockdown. There was nostalgia, social commentary, politics, and, yes, some truly absurd bits (hello, Moby's Dick). But it wasn’t just about the chaos of COVID or the insanity of that time. It was about laughing at all of it. And why now? Well, I never thought it possible, but half the U.S. seems to have gotten more selfish and stupid since lockdown. And with Trump still hanging around like an angry, orange dingleberry that refused to drop, it felt like the right moment to refresh these essays. Can you spell “sequel”?

Your reflections skew toward the absurd, but there’s truth and sharp insight underneath. What role do you think satire plays in helping us cope—or confront—societal dysfunction?  

Society is a trainwreck. We’re one power failure away from cannibalism. Satire is the fire extinguisher for the dumpster fire we’re living in. It doesn’t fix anything, but it makes life’s burnt marshmallows a little easier to stomach. Satire lets us laugh at things that are too messed up to face directly, because if we didn’t, we’d be hoarding toilet paper for the next apocalypse. Society itself is an illusion — a false construct built to control the mob with bread and circuses. Satire pulls back the curtain, showing us the absurdity while we’re too busy laughing at the clown. It’s not about ignoring the chaos. It’s about laughing so hard at it that you forget to be terrified, and for a moment, you realize: we’re all just part of the same Big Top culture.

You take shots at everything from politics to “Manopause.” Was anything off-limits for you when writing these essays?  

Off-limits? Pfft. There were no sacred cows. Only the excoriation of those lowing in the fields of conformity. If something felt untouchable, it was probably the first thing I aimed for. Politics, aging, idiocy, nothing was safe. The one thing I didn’t make light of was the 1,100,000+ Americans who died during COVID. Many unnecessarily. That was my line in the sand. But I didn’t hold back when it came to the "Covidiots" who defied every protocol, questioned vaccines, and made the rest of us pay for their selfishness. Those people? Brutal death wished upon them, figuratively, of course. Kinda.

How do you balance dark humor with emotional resonance without tipping too far into either?

Balancing dark humor with emotional resonance is like juggling chainsaws while riding a unicycle. Lean too far into the dark, and you’ll drop a chainsaw straight into the tire and break your neck. Go too light, and you end up juggling rubber chickens - awkward, pointless. No one’s impressed. The trick is knowing when to toss a sharp one and when to let the weight of the moment hang there, like talking over each other on Zoom during your lockdown Thanksgiving dinner. If you make someone laugh and then feel uncomfortable about it, you’ve nailed it. If not, well, you’re probably just going to need better insurance.

Fans of Seinfeld and observational humor will feel right at home in your work. Who are your humor or literary heroes?

While I’m flattered by some comparisons to Jonathan Swift and Dennis Miller, I’m also heavily influenced by the weird, the dark, and the absurd. Seinfeld, for example, is the gold standard for finding comedy in the mundane, like dealing with the aftermath of "Soup Nazis" or becoming "master of my domain." In literature, Vonnegut’s dark humor and Orwell’s sharp, allegorical insights are huge influences. Both tackle the bleakest parts of humanity with humor, yet depth. If a piece of writing can make you laugh and think, then it’s doing its job.

About Life Sucks: Memories and Introspections During the Great Covid Lockdown

Discover PS Conway's deeply cynical yet comedic reflections on the Great COVID Lockdown in this collection of satirical essays, perfect for fans of Seinfeld's humor about "nothing" and skeptics of society's enduring absurdities.

What happens when a poet with a darkly literate soul turns his attention to the absurdity of a global pandemic? You get PS Conway's unique brand of "literary comedic nihilism." Written during 40 weeks of lockdown, this unapologetically irreverent collection of essays is more relevant now than ever. Originally shared on his (now-defunct) blog, "Life Sucks. Laugh Here," Conway's essays serve as both a nostalgic reflection on a "troubling period in history" and a cautionary tale about society's cyclical absurdity.

A two-time Pushcart Nominee, Conway is the author of over 50 poems published across journals and anthologies, including two Amazon Best Sellers. He released his first poetry collection, Echoes Lost in Stars, in March 2024 to critical acclaim. With Life Sucks, Conway brings his trademark wit and dark humor to the page. From the existential significance of a colonoscopy to that of baseball and the overlooked reality of "Manopause," he fearlessly skewers lockdown life, politics, and the human condition.

By the time you finish Life Sucks, you'll understand what Conway meant when he wrote, "My intention was for readers to learn a little, laugh a lot, and then forget about it all, because none of it ever really mattered anyway. The good news? It happened before, and it'll happen again. You never had to worry. Ever. Facts are just science's opinions."

Buy Amazon Kindle | Paperback | Bookshop.org

Q&A with Jeremy Baker, The Guilty Sleep

The Guilty Sleep explores the emotional toll of war and what happens when past allegiances collide with present danger. What inspired this story? Was there a particular event or idea that sparked it?

Totally! I’m an Afghanistan combat veteran who struggled with PTSD after my deployment, which was predicated in large part on a central event mirroring something that happens to the protagonist in The Guilty Sleep, Dexter Grant. Now, what Dex went through is far worse than what I did, but there are definite parallels there. So, his struggles after the end of his war were definitely influenced and inspired by my own. Also, I started writing The Guilty Sleep in the aftermath of the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021. Like many other vets who served there, I had a ton of complex, complicated thoughts and feelings about the situation. Two decades of war, so many friends and allies lost, so much destruction, so much blood spilled—what to do with all of that? In some ways, some of the underlying themes of the book spring from those very strong feelings. There’s a particular scene in the book, the veterans’ support group that Dex attends, where I allow those thoughts and feelings to come a little closer to the surface in the conversation of the characters in the scene. Many of the things that are said by the characters are things I’ve heard—or said -+myself—in conversation with other Afghanistan vets after the U.S. withdrawal. 

Ultimately, what I wanted to do with The Guilty Sleep was (hopefully) tell a killer heist story while also exploring the themes of war, the emotional cost to warfighters, the bonds of camaraderie and family, and the desire to find and do the Next Right Thing.

Dexter Grant is such a layered character—veteran, father, husband, and reluctant criminal. How did he first come to you as a character?

Sometimes, entire stories come to me all at once. I’ll wake up with the idea fully formed, knowing exactly how the plot works and who the characters are. Dex came to me nearly so, although he was actually originally intended to be a her—Destiny Harper! Most of the story was exactly the same, though. As I approached the novel, I realized that to hit the right emotional notes and story beats, to make it feel as real as possible, I needed to get a little closer to the protagonist, put more of myself and my experiences and feelings into them, and Dex “Frogger” Grant came out of that.

The line between right and wrong gets very blurry. How did you approach writing the moral gray areas of the heist and Dex’s decisions?

A key theme of The Guilty Sleep is looking for the Next Right Thing, and what to do when that thing puts you at odds with your moral code. As an Army Counterintelligence Agent, we were trained to spot, assess, and recruit sources of information. A large part of recruiting a source is convincing someone that perhaps their Next Right Thing is in fact betraying their own country, terrorist, or criminal organization and providing information to the U.S. military. The motivation for this betrayal can be any number of things, from providing a financial incentive to appealing to someone’s moral code to serve a greater good. I tend to see the world in large swathes of black and right (probably as a result of my conservative Christian upbringing) with a huge gray area in the middle (probably a result of my lived experience working counterterrorism, intelligence, and national security). Really, when it came down to it, I put myself in Dex’s shoes as much as possible. What would I do if I was truly desperate, facing crushing debt and losing my family, my kid in need of an eyesight-saving surgery, and then I had an opportunity to fix all the financial burdens while at the same time saving the life of the man who saved my own? Would I be able to say no to that?  Fortunately, I haven’t faced that exact choice!

Were there any scenes that were especially difficult to write, emotionally or technically?

Two scenes really stand out for me:  

There’s the scene I already mentioned where a group of veterans discuss their feelings about the withdrawal from Afghanistan. This was a really difficult scene to write, because I both wanted to accurately capture my own challenging thoughts and feelings (sadness, frustration, resignation, anger) while also accurately sharing the various points of view I’d heard from other vets, some of which I agreed with and some with which I disagreed. And then, I needed to tie the scene into the movement of the book’s plot, so that it wasn’t just sitting there as a kind of self-indulgent navel-gazing discourse.

The second is a scene where Dex meets his daughter and his estranged wife at a local park.  As a devoted husband and father, it was really difficult to paint a picture of a family at the breaking point, mixing Dex’s love for his wife and daughter with the pain of their separation (and the root causes behind it) and his searing desire to make it all right, his willingness to take a desperate (and ultimately Very Bad) gamble, and his wife and daughter’s feelings as well.  This was an incredible complex and challenging scene for me.

What was your debut publishing journey like? Any surprises, lessons, or moments of doubt?

Publishing is almost exclusively crippling self-doubt punctuated by moments of terror, disappointment, uncertainty, and, yes, jubilant elation as well. At least it was for me. I remain convinced that any author who says they don’t face moments of self-doubt is either delusional, a big ol’ liar, or someone who’s enjoyed sustained success for so long that they could write anything and it would be an instant best-seller. The main lesson I took from this journey is twofold: tell the story only you can tell, and tell it in the way that only you can, and if you’re going to pursue traditional publishing, you need dogged determination, some luck, and a tremendous agent.

Who are your biggest literary influences?

Oh wow, there are so many in so many genres. When it comes to the crime/thriller genre, I love and admire James Crumley, CJ Box, SA Cosby, Jordan Harper, and Laura Lippman. I also read and write in a few other genres and take great joy and inspiration in writing from NK Jemisin, T Kingfisher, James SA Corey, Joe Hill, Chuck Wendig, and more. If I could write like anyone, I’d be Marcus Sakey crossed with Neal Stephenson.

Your dream casting for Dexter in a film or series adaptation?

I’ve definitely thought about this one. Out of left field choice, Rob McElhenney. He’s known for comedy, but he’s got great dramatic chops too and I think he’d be a great fit.  Aaron Taylor-Johnson would be great as well. If we’re gonna cast someone opposite Dex in the character of his old team leader, mentor, and partner Staff Sergeant Saenz, give me either Charlie Hunnam or Jon Bernthal.

About The Guilty Sleep:

No one gets hurt is a fine plan. A worthy goal. But when it comes down to the moment, there’s always plenty of hurt to go around.

Afghanistan vet Dexter Grant is broke, reeling from PTSD, and on the verge of divorce when he’s approached by his old Army buddies to help rescue their former interpreter, the man who once saved Dex’s life. It means ripping off a vicious queenpin’s drug proceeds—but not to worry, they have it all worked out. And if anyone can pull it off, it’s Dex’s former team lead, Staff Sergeant Saenz.

Tempted by an easy score that could make his own problems disappear and imbued with new purpose, Dex agrees to play his part in the scheme. But just as in combat, the best-laid plans don’t survive first contact with the enemy. When the heist goes off the rails, his wife and daughter become targets for bloody revenge. Dex must face down his spiraling inner darkness and call on all his strength and training to save his girls. In his quest, he’ll learn there was much more to this heist than he ever imagined.

Jeremy D. Baker bursts onto the crime fiction scene with this debut thriller that recalls C. J. Box’s unlikely hero Joe Pickett and the small-town, lived-in noir of S. A. Cosby. Told from three revolving points-of-view, The Guilty Sleep is a riveting tale of robbery and betrayal in which a father’s love faces off with a soldier’s debt.

Buy on Amazon Kindle | Hardcover | Bookshop.org